|
6-hour and 4-hour Document Inspection processes |
|
We reserve the word Review for confrontation of
a document (after all, all we do in development is writing documents!) with
the heads (experience) of collegues. We use the word Inspection
for the formal confrontation of a document with other documents. |
Document Inspections according to the
Gilb method (book ref.
SP6) are greatly
more productive than the review methods currently in use by most development organisations.
Try it and experience the difference!
For introducing this Inspection process we provide the 6-hours Inspection process,
as shown below. As soon as all team-members in a project have experienced this process
once, you can switch to the 4-hours Inspection process. In the 4-hours process,
the KickOff meeting is reduced to 30 minutes and the Logging meeting is reduced
to 90 minutes. So, when you decide to routinely use Inspections in you project,
every Inspection costs 4 hours times the number of participants. Now, who dares
to maintain that his review process is more economical? We can prove that
the Gilb Inspection process is far more economical!
The 6-hour Inspection process (for organisations starting using Inspections) is organised as follows:
Kick-off meeting: 2 hr
|
| Individual checking (by the author and some (2 to 5) colleagues) of the document: 2 hr |
Logging meeting: 2 hr
|
An introduction program to start this process is organised as follows:
1st day:
|
| 2nd day: (Several days later. During this time the checkers do their individual checking. Leave them sufficient time!)
|
Cost of this program:
| day 1 | checking | day 2 | |
| Authors | 3 hr | 2 hr | 2 hr + repair of document |
| Checkers (each) | 2 hr | 2 hr | 2 hr |
| Inspection leader (N.R. Malotaux) | 1 day | - | 1 day |
In these two days two documents are Inspected and some 6 to 12 engineers experience the Inspection process for real. You will be amazed about the enthusiasm generated among the participants!
Questions: use the feedback form.